Imagine a standard coin. When you toss this coin and let it fall freely, theoretically, the chances of it landing on heads or tails are equal, each with a 50% probability. This phenomenon is a typical demonstration of randomness and probability theory.
Now, suppose we make a small modification to this coin, such as attaching a slightly heavier lead piece to the heads side. When you toss the coin again, you will find that due to the extra weight, the probability of the coin landing heads down significantly increases. This shows that even minor changes can significantly affect the probability distribution of outcomes.
This example can be likened to the betting or decision-making process. In an ideal and completely fair situation, the outcome of each choice should be random and have an equal probability. However, once some form of imbalance is introduced (such as information asymmetry or minor changes in rules), this balance is disrupted, making certain outcomes more likely than others. This is akin to adding a lead piece to one side of the coin, changing the originally equal probability distribution.
Why do most people often face losses after long-term participation in football betting, resulting in a common phenomenon of "nine out of ten bets losing"? This can mainly be attributed to two factors:
1. Unequal Odds Design: In football betting, every time your prediction is inaccurate, you lose your entire bet amount. However, when you win a bet, the return you receive is usually less than your original bet amount, such as only 0.9 or 0.8 times. This means that even if your prediction accuracy reaches 50%, due to this odds structure, you will still face a loss of 5% to 10%.
2. Bookmaker's Strategic Optimization: In football betting, bookmakers use various strategies to influence the outcome of bets, increasing the likelihood of player failure. This is like adding more uncertain factors to the "black" (losing) option in football betting, making it more likely to occur. Therefore, even if you strive to achieve a 50% prediction accuracy, due to the manipulation and strategies of the bookmakers, it may be even more difficult to actually achieve this goal.
Our first question is: Where is the lead piece on this coin?
Take, for example, a high-profile match: Germany vs. Denmark. Logically, with Germany having a 1.5 goal advantage in the game, the distribution of bets should be relatively balanced. However, on the eve of the match, the bookmakers, based on various information collected, predicted that Germany would at most win by one goal, or even draw. The main reason behind this prediction was the reluctance to fight within the German team, as the players were concerned about injuries affecting their transfers at the end of the season, and thus might not give their best effort.
This inside information was a secret to the outside world. Thus, the bookmakers began to "nail" the betting market. They first widely publicized in the media that the German team was eager to win, claiming that the players were competing for starting positions. Then, the bookmakers began to manipulate the betting market, gradually lowering the odds for Germany, continually attracting bettors to place bets. As the match approached, the bookmakers adjusted the betting line to Germany giving 1.75 goals, while continuing to lower the odds.
Under such betting lines and odds, ordinary bettors felt immense pressure. On the one hand, the constant favorable news for Germany and the decreasing odds attracted them to bet, while on the other hand, the allure of the odds was also strengthening. Many people worried about missing out on lower odds and hurried to place bets.
As a result, a large amount of capital flowed towards Germany. However, the final result of the match surprised everyone: Germany and Denmark drew 0:0. Bettors who bet on the upper line (Germany) were almost completely wiped out, and many furiously criticized the German team. In this gambling game, the German team was unjustly blamed, while the bookmakers secretly rejoiced.
This story is not fictional. In fact, such carefully manipulated cases are not uncommon in the gambling world, with similar situations occurring weekly. Of course, not every upper line is represented by Germany, nor is every lower line a European fairy tale. Now, you might have understood the real meaning of the "nails" the bookmakers put into the betting market, right? Indeed, it is psychological manipulation and opinion guidance.
Bookmakers use public opinion, the opening situation of the betting market, well-planned manipulation strategies, and various other tactics to continuously "nail" the black end of the betting market, influencing and manipulating the psychology of bettors. These strategies effectively guide the public's betting tendencies, resulting in the common phenomenon of most people choosing the black end (upper line) and consequently incurring losses.
Such revelations might disappoint and dismay many, as they unveil an unknown side of the gambling world.
Once we master this kind of observational skill, things become relatively simpler. We may not be aware of the stories happening behind the scenes:
- The team members' reluctance to fight,
- The team's strategy for the match, choosing a conservative approach, ensuring a draw, focusing on defense, seeking more clean sheets, or making concessions for various reasons.
- It could also be the bookmakers having some insider information, such as players or referees betting through underground black market platforms, which we are unaware of, but does indeed happen often in the real world.
- Or it could be strategies from the tournament organizers that we don’t know about, like ensuring the watchability of the match to increase competition between teams, thereby enhancing the commercial value of the league or cup tournament.
They will all be reflected in the changes of the data, and we can observe it.
For more information, please join the Premium Subscription and get the link to The blogger's Telegram Group.
Users pay $7 per month to gain access to an elite membership group. The blogger selects and analyzes soccer matches daily within the group, including changes in data, team preparation strategies, player conditions, and the most probable trends in match outcomes. This approach has a relatively high and stable success rate, with results that are publicly traceable.
"Visible to Premium Members only."